Cook Medical adheres to the system of MRI compatibility terms developed in 2005 by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). This adoption came about in an effort to clarify the terminology and, more important, because misuse of old terminology could result in serious accidents for patients and other individuals. This new system references the MR environment where testing took place, which includes the location inside the static magnetic field and its magnitude, spatial gradients, time varying magnetic fields, radio frequency (RF) magnetic field pulses and specific absorption rates (SAR).
Taking these conditions into consideration, three new categories were developed: MR Safe, MR Conditional, and MR Unsafe. In this system, 'safe' and 'unsafe' are the two extremes. 'Conditional' is in the middle and characterizes the behavior of the item under specific conditions in the MRI environment as determined by testing. In addition to the new terms, the ASTM International document introduced corresponding icons consistent with international standards for colors and shapes of safety signs. The icons are intended for use on items that may be brought into or near the MRI environment as well as in product labeling. The new terminology and icon structure is intended to help elucidate matters related to biomedical implants and devices to ensure the safe use of MRI technology.
MR Safe—An item that poses no known hazards in all MRI environments. MR Safe items include nonconducting, nonmetallic, nonmagnetic items such as plastic, silicone and glass. An item may be determined to be MR Safe on the basis of scientific rationale rather than test data.MR Conditional—An item that has been demonstrated to pose no known hazards in a specified MRI environment with specified conditions of use. Field conditions should be enumerated on the product, its packaging or in the enclosed literature. Additional conditions, including specific configurations of the item (e.g., the routing of leads used for a neurostimulation system) may be required.
MR Unsafe—An item that is known to pose hazards in all MRI environments. MR Unsafe items include magnetic items such as a pair of ferromagnetic scissors.Links from the chart below take you to the product page for more information.
Products Material Order Number
(Prefix)MR
SafeMR
ConditionalMR
UnsafeEmbolization Coils Stainless Steel Stainless Steel MWCE X Nester® Platinum MWCE-NESTER X MicroNester®
Microcoils™Platinum MWCE-NESTER X Tornado® Platinum MWCE-TORNADO X Hilal Microcoils™ Platinum MWCE-HILAL X MReye® Inconel® IMWCE X MReye Flipper® Inconel IFMWCE X Vena Cava Filters Günther Tulip™ Conichrome™ IGTCFS X Cook Celect® Conichrome IGTCFS-CELECT X Gianturco-
Roehm Bird's Nest®Stainless Steel BNF X Stents Zilver 518® Vascular Nitinol ZIV5 X Zilver 518® Biliary Nitinol ZIB5 X Zilver 635® Vascular Nitinol ZIV6 X Zilver 635® Biliary Nitinol ZIB6 X Formula™ 418 Stainless Steel FORB4 X Vital-Port® Systems Dual Chamber
Titanium–PetiteTitanium IP X Dual Chamber
Titanium–StandardTitanium IP X MRI–Petite Titanium IP X MRI–Standard Titanium IP X Titanium–Mini Titanium IP X Titanium–Petite Titanium IP X Titanium–Standard Titanium IP X Titanium for Peripheral
Placement–MiniTitanium IP X Conichrome is a trademark of Carpenter Technologies.
Inconel is a registered trademark of Huntington Alloys Corporation.- Cook Celect Vena Cava Filter
Non-clinical testing has demonstrated that the Cook Celect Vena Cava Filter is MR Conditional. It can be scanned safely immediately after placement under the following conditions:
- Static magnetic field strengths of 3.0 Tesla or less
- Maximum spatial gradient field of 330 gauss/cm or less
- Maximum whole body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of 2.0 W/kg for 15 minutes of scanning
In non-clinical testing, the Cook Celect Vena Cava Filter produced a temperature rise of less than 0.2 degrees C at a maximum whole body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of 2.0 W/kg for 15 minutes of MR scanning in a 3.0 Tesla MR system using a transmit/receive body coil MR scanner. MR image quality may be compromised if the area of interest is in the exact same area or relatively close to the position of the Cook Celect Vena Cava Filter. Therefore, it may be necessary to optimize MR imaging parameters for the presence of this metallic implant.
- Embolization Coils - Stainless Steel
Stainless steel coils are ferrous and are affected by the MR field. Bench top testing on stainless steel embolization coil samples showed high degrees of torque and deflection. Therefore, stainless steel embolization coils have a designation of MR Unsafe and we would not recommend a patient implanted with a stainless steel embolization coil be scanned.
- Formula 418 Balloon Expandable Biliary Stent
Non-clinical testing has demonstrated that the Formula Biliary Stent is MR Conditional. A patient with this stent may undergo MRI immediately after placement under the following conditions:
- Static magnetic field of 3.0 Tesla or less
- Maximum spatial gradient magnetic field of 720 gauss/cm
- Maximum MR system reported whole body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of 3.0 W/kg for 15 minutes of scanning
In non-clinical testing, the Formula Biliary Stent produced a temperature rise of less than 1 degree C at an MR system reported maximum whole body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of 3 W/kg for 15 minutes of MR scanning in a 3 Tesla, Excite, Software G3.0-052B, General Electric Medical Systems MR scanner.
MR image quality may be compromised if the area of interest is in the exact same area or relatively close to the position of the Formula Biliary Stent. Therefore, it may be necessary to optimize MR imaging parameters for the presence of this metallic implant. The effect of heating in the MRI environment for overlapping stents or stents with fractured struts is unknown.
- Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filter
Non-clinical testing has demonstrated that the Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filter is MR Conditional. It can be scanned safely immediately after placement under the following conditions:
- Static magnetic field strengths of 3.0 Tesla or less
- Maximum spatial gradient field of 525 gauss/cm or less
- Maximum whole body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of 3.0 W/kg for 15 minutes of scanning
In non-clinical testing, the Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filter produced a temperature rise of less than 0.6 degrees C at a maximum whole body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of 3.0 W/kg for 15 minutes of MR scanning in a 3.0 Tesla MR system using a transmit/receive body coil (Excite, Software G3.0-052B, General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) MR scanner.
MR image quality may be compromised if the area of interest is in the exact same area or relatively close to the position of the Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filter. Therefore, it may be necessary to optimize MR imaging parameters for the presence of this metallic implant.
- Gianturco-Roehm Bird’s Nest Vena Cava Filter
MR-Safe, no additional risk to patients, but may affect the quality of the diagnostic information if scanning in the area of the filter.
MRI diagnostic procedrues should be postponed for 6 weeks following filter implantation to ensure device incorporation into the vessel wall.
- Hilal Embolization Microcoils
Hilal Embolization Coils are manufactured from a platinum composition, which has been shown to have no ferromagnetic response. Through non-clinical testing, embolization coils manufactured of this material have been shown to be MR Conditional. A patient with one of these implants can be scanned safely immediately after placement under the following conditions:
- Static magnetic field strengths of 3.0 Tesla or less
- Maximum spatial gradient field of 330 gauss/cm
- Maximum MR system whole-body-averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of 3-W/kg for 15 minutes of scanning
In this testing, platinum embolization coils produced a temperature rise of greater than 0.5 degrees C at a maximum whole body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of 2.0 W/kg for 20 minutes of MRI. The effect of heating for other conditions, multiple coils or overlapping coils is unknown.
MR image quality may be compromised if the area of interest is in the exact same area or relatively close to the position of platinum embolization coils.
- MReye Embolization Coils
Through non-clinical testing, the MReye Embolization Coil has been shown to be MR Conditional. It can be scanned safely immediately after placement under the following conditions:
- Static magnetic field strengths of 3.0 Tesla or less
- Maximum spatial gradient of 330 gauss/cm
- Maximum whole body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of 2.0 W/kg for 20 minutes of MRI
The MReye Embolization Coil will not migrate in this MRI environment. Non-clinical testing has not been performed to rule out the possibility of device migration at static magnetic field strengths higher than 3.0 Tesla and a maximum spatial gradient higher than 330 gauss/cm.
In this testing, the MReye Embolization Coil produced a temperature rise of greater than or equal to 0.6 degrees C at a maximum whole body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of 2.0 W/kg for 20 minutes of MRI. The effect of heating in the MRI environment for other conditions, multiple coils or overlapping coils is unknown.
MRI image quality may be compromised if the area of interest is in the exact same area or relatively close to the position of the MReye Embolization Coil.
- MReye Flipper Detachable Embolization Coils
Through non-clinical testing, the MReye Flipper Detachable Embolization Coil Delivery System has been shown to be MR Conditional. It can be scanned safely immediately after placement under the following conditions:
- Static magnetic field strengths of 3.0 Tesla or less
- Maximum spatial gradient of 330 gauss/cm
- Maximum whole body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of 2.0 W/kg for 20 minutes of MRI
Embolization coils manufactured of Inconel will not migrate in this MRI environment. Non-clinical testing has not been performed to rule out the possibility of device migration at static magnetic field strengths higher than 3.0 Tesla and a maximum spatial gradient higher than 330 gauss/cm.
In this testing, the MReye Embolization Coil produced a temperature rise of greater than or equal to 0.6 degrees C at a maximum whole body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of 2.0 W/kg for 20 minutes of MRI. The effect of heating in the MRI environment for other conditions, multiple coils or overlapping coils is unknown.
MRI image quality may be compromised if the area of interest is in the exact same area or relatively close to the position of the MReye Embolization Coil.
- Nester Embolization Coils
Nester Embolization Coils are manufactured from a platinum composition, which has been shown to have no ferromagnetic response. Through non-clinical testing, embolization coils manufactured of this material have been shown to be MR Conditional. A patient with one of these implants can be scanned safely immediately after placement under the following conditions:
- Static magnetic field strengths of 3.0 Tesla or less
- Maximum spatial gradient field of 330 gauss/cm
- Maximum MR system whole-body-averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of 3-W/kg for 15 minutes of scanning
In this testing, platinum embolization coils produced a temperature rise of greater than 0.5 degrees C at a maximum whole body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of 2.0 W/kg for 20 minutes of MRI. The effect of heating for other conditions, multiple coils or overlapping coils is unknown.
MR image quality may be compromised if the area of interest is in the exact same area or relatively close to the position of platinum embolization coils.
- Tornado Embolization Coils
Tornado Embolization Coils are manufactured from a platinum composition, which has been shown to have no ferromagnetic response. Through non-clinical testing, embolization coils manufactured of this material have been shown to be MR Conditional. A patient with one of these implants can be scanned safely immediately after placement under the following conditions:
- Static magnetic field strengths of 3.0 Tesla or less
- Maximum spatial gradient field of 330 gauss/cm
- Maximum MR system whole-body-averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of 3-W/kg for 15 minutes of scanning
In this testing, platinum embolization coils produced a temperature rise of greater than 0.5 degrees C at a maximum whole body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of 2.0 W/kg for 20 minutes of MRI. The effect of heating for other conditions, multiple coils or overlapping coils is unknown.
MR image quality may be compromised if the area of interest is in the exact same area or relatively close to the position of platinum embolization coils.
- Zilver Self-Expanding Stent
Non-clinical testing has demonstrated that the Zilver Self-Expanding Stent is MR Conditional. It can be scanned safely under the following conditions:
- Static magnetic field of 3 Tesla or less
- Spatial gradient field of 720 Gauss/cm or less
- Whole body averaged specific absorption rate (SAR) of 1.5 W/kg (for a single stent at 1.5 Tesla) and 3 W/kg (for a single stent at 3 Tesla and a pair of overlapping stents at 1.5 and 3 Tesla) for 20 minutes (for a single stent at 1.5 Tesla) and 15 minutes of scanning (for a single stent at 3 Tesla and a pair of overlapping stents at 1.5 and 3 Tesla), respectively.
In non-clinical testing, the Zilver Self-Expanding Stent produced maximum temperature rises of 0.1, 3.8, 0.8, and 0.1 degrees C (for a single stent at 1.5 Tesla, a pair of overlapping stents at 1.5 Tesla, a single stent at 3 Tesla, and a pair of overlapping stents at 3 Tesla, respectively) at whole body averaged specific absorption rates (SAR) of 1.5 W/kg (for a single stent at 1.5 Tesla) and 3 W/kg (for a single stent at 3 Tesla and a pair of overlapping stents at 1.5 and 3 Tesla) for 20 minutes (for a single stent at 1.5 Tesla) and 15 minutes (for a single stent at 3 Tesla and a pair of overlapping stents at 1.5 and 3 Tesla) of MR scanning in a 1.5 Tesla/64 MHz General Electric MR scanner, a 1.5 Tesla Magnetom Siemens Medical Solutions MR Scanner (to evaluate a pair of overlapping stents), and a 3 Tesla Excite General Electric MR scanner.
MR image quality may be compromised if the area of interest is in the exact same area or relatively close to the position of the Zilver Self-Expanding Stent. Therefore, it may be necessary to optimize MR imaging parameters for the presence of this metallic implant.
Heating in the MRI environment for stents with fractured struts is not known.
Cook eNews
Sign up here to receive e-mail from Cook on clinical updates, new product details and educational opportunities.
Sign Up »