Choose your Region

Are you sure you want to proceed?

You will be leaving the Cook Medical website that you were viewing and going to a Cook Medical website for another region or country. Not all products are approved in all regulatory jurisdictions. The product information on these websites is intended only for licensed physicians and healthcare professionals.

Home Predictable Safe Proven Durable Innovative Paclitaxel history Patient education References

 

Proven

Long-term results delivered

Zilver PTX offers a less-invasive option for patients with life-limiting conditions associated with PAD, providing long-term clinical results compared to standard endovascular treatments1. When compared to the competition, Zilver PTX provides:

  • A reduced risk of restenosis and reinterventions with superior long-term outcomes (5 years) to standard of care (BMS)1
  • Similar primary patency, FF-TLR, amputation, and survival rates at 5-years compared to bypass while also having significantly shorter hospital stays at procedure and 30-day complications2
  • Similar primary patency and CD-TLR rates in both real-world (1-year)3 and RCT (5-year)4 when compared to Eluvia without the concerns of permanent polymers

 

Proven at 5 years | Zilver PTX RCT


 

Proven against bypass | ZILVERPASS 5-year results

The ZILVERPASS objective was to evaluate the performance of Zilver PTX compared to prosthetic bypass surgery for the treatment of femoropopliteal TASC C & D lesions. The RCT included an economic analysis at 36 months and a final clinical publication  at 60 months.

A bold decision: The Zilver PTX randomized controlled trial was designed from the start to include 5-year follow-up data that would determine not only long-term benefits but also long-term safety signals or adverse events.


 

Compared to patients who underwent prosthetic bypass surgery, Zilver PTX patients had:

• Significantly shorter hospital stays at procedure7

• Significantly fewer complications through 30 days7

• Similar survival rate through 5 years2


 

Economic analysis (US)

The economic analysis, taking into account procedural, hospitalization, and reintervention costs, showed a clear cost-benefit for Zilver PTX, in the USA reimbursement model.8


Conclusion: These final 5-year results unequivocally establish the non-inferiority of the Zilver PTX stent compared to above-the-knee prosthetic bypass surgery, underscoring their comparable effectiveness and safety profiles.2


 

Proven in a broad range of lesions

*Subgroup of patients for the Zilver PTX single arm study. Long lesion group was 135 lesions that were > 15 cm, corresponding to TASC C or D. Results from a non-pre-specified post-hoc analysis.

Note: CTO = Chronic Total Occlusion; PSVR = Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio.


 

References


  1. Dake MD, Ansel GM, Jaff MR, et al. Durable clinical effectiveness with paclitaxel-eluting stents in the femoropopliteal artery: 5-year results of the Zilver PTX randomized trial. Circulation. 2016;133(15):1472-1483.
  2. Bosiers MJ, De Donato G, Torsello G, et al. ZILVERPASS Study: Zilver PTX stent versus prosthetic above-the-knee bypass surgery in femoropopliteal lesions. 5-year results. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024;46(10):1348–1358. doi.org/10.1007/s00270-023-03549-0
  3. Shibata T, Iba Y, Shingaki M, et al. One year outcomes of Zilver PTX versus Eluvia for femoropopliteal disease in real-world practice: REALDES study. J Endovasc Ther. 2025;32(2):490–497.
  4. Gray W. CRT-300.01. Five-year results from the IMPERIAL randomized study of Eluvia and Zilver PTX drug-eluting stents and the long lesion sub-study for femoropopliteal artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2023;16(4 suppl):S55.
  5. Dake MD, Scheinert D, Tepe G, et al. Nitinol stents with polymer-free paclitaxel coating for lesions in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries above the knee: twelve-month safety and effectiveness results from the Zilver PTX single-arm clinical study. J Endovasc Ther. 2011;18(5):613–623.
  6. Dake MD, Ansel GM, Jaff MR, et al. Sustained safety and effectiveness of paclitaxel-eluting stents for femoropopliteal lesions: 2-year follow-up from the Zilver PTX randomized and single-arm clinical studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(24):2417–2427.
  7. Bosiers M, Setacci C, De Donato G, et al. ZILVERPASS Study: Zilver PTX stent vs bypass surgery in femoropopliteal lesions. J Endovasc Ther. 2020;27(2):287–295.doi:10.1177/1526602820902014
  8. Bosiers M, De Donato G, Torsello G, et al. ZILVERPASS study: ZILVER PTX stent vs. bypass surgery in femoropopliteal lesions, 3 year results and economic analysis. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2023;64:413–421.
  9. Yokoi H, Ohki T, Kichikawa, K, et al. Zilver PTX post-market surveillance study of paclitaxel-eluting stents for treating femoropopliteal artery disease in Japan: 12-month results. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2016;9(3): 271-277.
  10. Bosiers M, Peeters P, Tessarek J, et al. The Zilver PTX single arm study: 12-month results from the TASC C/D lesion subgroup. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2013;54(1):115–122.